On February 28, 2020 4:49:45 PM GMT+02:00, Rifat Ucal <ru...@arcor.de> wrote: >Hi Gluster Team, > > >I am trying to implment gluster fs in podman containers, which is >running except the problems described below. > > >My observations: > >- The bricks on the server is gong offline when one of the podman >container is restarted or the appropriate server is rebooted. > >- Althoug the status of the bricks are offline, the replication seems >to be working, as data will be replicated. > >- I see that the replicated data will also be replicated on arbiter >node, where I was expecting to see only meta data. > > > >My configuration. > >I created glusterfs for replication in 3 nodes on centos7 but in podman >containers > >The containers in the first and second nodes should be normal >replication and 3rd node arbiter node. > >After creation replication and enabling heal processes I can see also >that 3rd node is marked as arbiter node. > >According to description of arbiter, the arbiter node should store only >metadata but in my configuration the replicated data will be stored in >all bricks including arbiter node. > > > >Questions: > >When rebooting one of the server or restarting one of the glusterfs >container the restarted container is not going online until gluster >volume is stopped and started again. Is it a solution inbetween to >resolve this problem? > >-why Arbiter node stores all the data, allthough it should only have >some metadata to restore the replicated data on other nodes. I would >not have problem that replication is done in all three nodes. I just >need to know > >- Can you give me feedback, whether some one experience or similar >porblems with glusterfs implemented in podman containers? > > >Here are my configurations: > >on all containers I have :CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 glusterfs >version 7.3 and systemctl is enabled for glusterd service > > >My gluster volume creation: > >gluster volume create cgvol1 replica 2 arbiter 1 transport tcp >avm1:/cbricks/brick1/data avm2:/cbricks/brick1/data >dvm1:/cbricks/brick1/data force > > >gluster peer status excuted on avm2: >Number of Peers: 2 > >Hostname: avm1 >Uuid: 5d1dc6a7-8f34-45a3-a7c9-c69c442b66dc >State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > >Hostname: dvm1 >Uuid: 310ffd58-28ab-43f1-88d3-1e381bd46ab3 >State: Peer in Cluster (Connected) > > >gluster volume info > >Volume Name: cgvol1 >Type: Replicate >Volume ID: da975178-b68f-410c-884c-a7f635e4381a >Status: Started >Snapshot Count: 0 >Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3 >Transport-type: tcp >Bricks: >Brick1: arvm1:/cbricks/brick1/data >Brick2: avm2:/cbricks/brick1/data >Brick3: devm1:/cbricks/brick1/data (arbiter) >Options Reconfigured: >cluster.self-heal-daemon: on >cluster.entry-self-heal: on >cluster.metadata-self-heal: on >cluster.data-self-heal: on >transport.address-family: inet >storage.fips-mode-rchecksum: on >nfs.disable: on >performance.client-io-threads: off > > >gluster volume status >Status of volume: cgvol1 >Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Brick avm1:/cbricks/brick1/data 49152 0 Y 516 >Brick avm2:/cbricks/brick1/data 49152 0 Y 353 >Brick dvm1:/cbricks/brick1/data 49152 0 Y 572 >Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A Y 537 >Self-heal Daemon on dvm1 N/A N/A Y 593 >Self-heal Daemon on avm2 N/A N/A Y 374 > >Task Status of Volume cgvol1 >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >There are no active volume tasks > >gluster volume heal cgvol1 info >Brick avm1:/cbricks/brick1/data >Status: Connected >Number of entries: 0 > >Brick avm2:/cbricks/brick1/data >Status: Connected >Number of entries: 0 > >Brick dvm1:/cbricks/brick1/data >Status: Connected >Number of entries: 0 > > > >Best Regards, > >Rifat Ucal > > > >> Jorick Astrego <jor...@netbulae.eu> hat am 14. Februar 2020 um 10:10 >geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> It looks like you have a two node setup? >> >> Then it's expected as with two nodes you don't have quorum and >this can lead to split brains. >> >> To have HA, add another node or an arbiter node. >> >> >https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/arbiter-volumes-and-quorum/ >> >> You can also modify the quorum but then you shouldn't be too >attachted to the data you have on it. >> >> Regards, Jorick >> >> On 2/14/20 9:27 AM, Cloud Udupi wrote: >> >> > > Hi, >> > >> > I am new to glusterfs. I have used this guide on >CentOS-7.6. >> > >https://microdevsys.com/wp/glusterfs-configuration-and-setup-w-nfs-ganesha-for-an-ha-nfs-cluster/ >> > >> > glusterfs —version >> > glusterfs 7.2 >> > >> > Firewall is disabled. Self heal is enabled. >> > Everything works fine until I reboot one of the servers. >When the server reboots the brick doesn't come online. >> > >> > gluster volume status >> > >> > Status of volume: gv01 >> > Gluster process TCP Port RDMA >Port Online Pid >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Brick server1:/bricks/0/gv0 N/A N/A > N N/A >> > Brick server2:/bricks/0/gv0 49152 0 > Y 99870 >> > Self-heal Daemon on localhost N/A N/A > Y 109802 >> > Self-heal Daemon on server1 N/A N/A > Y 2142 >> > >> > Task Status of Volume gv01 >> > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > There are no active volume tasks >> > >> > gluster volume heal gv01 >> > >> > Launching heal operation to perform index self heal on >volume gv01 has been unsuccessful: >> > >> > Glusterd Syncop Mgmt brick op 'Heal' failed. Please check >glustershd log file for details. >> > >> > gluster volume heal gv01 info >> > >> > gluster volume heal gv01 info >> > Brick server1:/bricks/0/gv0 >> > Status: Transport endpoint is not connected >> > >> > Number of entries: - >> > >> > >> > When I do "gluster volume start gv01 force" brick starts. >> > >> > I want the brick to come online automatically after the >reboot. I have attached log file. >> > Please help. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Mark. >> > >> > >> > ________ >> > >> > Community Meeting Calendar: >> > >> > APAC Schedule - >> > Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST >> > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 >> > >> > NA/EMEA Schedule - >> > Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT >> > Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 >> > >> > Gluster-users mailing list >> > Gluster-users@gluster.org mailto:Gluster-users@gluster.org >> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > >> > > >> >> >> Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, >> >> Jorick Astrego >> >> Netbulae Virtualization Experts >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> Tel: 053 20 30 270 i...@netbulae.eu Staalsteden 4-3A >> KvK >08198180 >> Fax: 053 20 30 271 www.netbulae.eu 7547 TA Enschede >> BTW >NL821234584B01 >> >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> > > > > >> ________ >> >> Community Meeting Calendar: >> >> APAC Schedule - >> Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 11:30 AM IST >> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 >> >> NA/EMEA Schedule - >> Every 1st and 3rd Tuesday at 01:00 PM EDT >> Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 >> >> Gluster-users mailing list >> Gluster-users@gluster.org >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users >> > > >
Hi Rifat, Can you reproduce the same behaviour on VMs or physical machines ? If yes, then it could be an issue in the gluster version you are using, otherwise it will be related to the containerization of gluster. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/441850968 Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
