On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:44:28PM +0530, gagan tiwari wrote: > HI Alexander, > Thanks for the update. Initially, I also > thought of deploying Ceph but ceph is quite difficult to set-up and manage. > Moreover, it's also hardware demanding. I think it's most suitable for a > very large set-up with hundreds of clients.
I strongly disagree. I run a small (3 nodes) Ceph cluster in my homelab and following the official docs it's pretty easy to set up. The hardware demands mostly depend on what performance one needs - the more performance (e.g. NVMe storage and 100 GBit networking) one wants, the more powerful hardware one has to provide, as usual. My nodes are Intel D-1521 with 64G of (ECC, of course) RAM and Connect-X 4 cards running at 10 GBit and storage on HDDs which provide reasonable performance for my needs - not a HPC setup, of course. > What do you think of MooseFS ? Have you or anyone else tried MooseFS. If > yes, how was its performance? Last time I looked, MooseFS needs a commercial license for the full feature set (e.g. highly available metadata (_that_ is not negotiable!), erasure oding, Windows clients) which killed it for my non-commercial use case. Kind regards, Alex. -- "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." -- Thomas A. Edison ________ Community Meeting Calendar: Schedule - Every 2nd and 4th Tuesday at 14:30 IST / 09:00 UTC Bridge: https://meet.google.com/cpu-eiue-hvk Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users