Ansa (http://www.beta-cae.gr/ansa.htm)  is a great tool for creating 
windflow-meshes around buildings.
90% of Workload is fixing Autocad mistakes, object simplification, and stuff 
like that. 
Gmsh is not really designed for that.

However, for simple models, gmsh is superior, as the learning curve is much 
better.
Also, if you have a good cluster and want to trade of computation time from 
manual time, spider is an option:
http://www.meshing.at/Spiderhome/Home.html
it does automatic geometry simplification, but can currently only handle one 
air volume . Meshes are not that cute, but hey, more coffee-time...

We do building flows on a regular basis, meshsizes of 20 million cells, with an 
enviromental radius of up to 1000m including all neighboring buildings...

-----------------------------------
Bernhard Kubicek
Energy Department
Electric Energy Systems

Bitte beachten Sie unsere neuen Kontaktdaten!
Please note our new contact details!

AIT Austrian Institute of Technology
Österreichisches Forschungs- und Prüfzentrum Arsenal Ges.m.b.H.
Giefinggasse 2 | 1210 Vienna | Austria
T +43(0) 50550-6258 | M +43(0) 664 6207748

[email protected] | http://www.ait.ac.at
________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] On Behalf Of Antonella Grassano 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Gmsh] GMSH and buildings-wind interaction

Hello,
I would like to know if gmsh is suitable to model the wind flow around a 
building? Does it have a limit on the number of cell? What file format can be 
imported?
Many thanks
Best Regards
Antonella

________________________________
La tua privacy è al sicuro con Internet Explorer 8. Scopri di 
più<http://www.microsoft.com/italy/windows/internet-explorer/features/browse-privately.aspx?tabid=2&catid=1>

_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to