Hi, I tried to use the periodic boundary condition with gmsh 2.5 (see attached helix.geo file)
I obtained a strange result when imposing periodicity between surface 205 (slave) and surface 203 (master) (last line of *.geo file). Did I made a mistake (bad syntax or anything else ...) or is it a bug? In the expression-list should the boundary lines of each surface be signed or is it pointless? (I tried both with same bad result) Thanks for helping Francoise
helix.geo
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
