|
Periodicity is still an experimental feature. Syntax is correct. There is indeed a bug. Ruth On 22/10/10 20:45, [email protected] wrote: Hi, I tried to use the periodic boundary condition with gmsh 2.5 (see attached helix.geo file)I obtained a strange result when imposing periodicity between surface 205 (slave) and surface 203 (master) (last line of *.geo file). Did I made a mistake (bad syntax or anything else ...) or is it a bug? In the _expression_-list should the boundary lines of each surface be signed or is it pointless? (I tried both with same bad result) Thanks for helping Francoise_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Dr. Ir. Ruth V. Sabariego University of Liege, Dept. of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Applied & Computational Electromagnetics (ACE), phone: +32-4-3663737 - fax: +32-4-3662910 - http://ace.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/ |
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://www.geuz.org/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
