> On 07 Feb 2016, at 19:25, walter steffe <[email protected]> wrote: > > The attached file is a mesh generated by Gmsh library linked to EmCAD. > The mesh associated with Elementary Entity Surface number 4 (and also e > few other faces) is incomplete. > This surface mesh should copied from an other surface. EmCAD makes use > of GFace::setMeshMaster to enforce this condition. The affine > transformation relating the two faces is a rotation about the cylinder > axis. > > It is quite strange that the original face is properly meshed while the > copy is not. It is even more strange that other 18 copies of the > same original face (with different rotation angles) are properly meshed > while only 3 faces are incomplete. > > I do not understand well the mesh file format but I think that the slave > face meshes should just refer to the master face and the related > transformation. > > So I do not understand why there is such big difference between master > and slave meshes. Is it a visualization problem ?. >
I don't think so: the actual mesh is indeed incomplete. The problem is most probably in the generation of the slave mesh. Quite a bit of work has been going on on periodic meshes in recent releases: I would try with the latest stable release to see if the problem persists. > > > > <model.msh>_______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine Tetrahedron V, July 4-5 2016: http://tetrahedron.montefiore.ulg.ac.be Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
