> On 29 Feb 2016, at 16:31, Benjamin Isbarn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm wondering if it is safe to assume a constant sequence regarding > the element types in the MSH2 output files?! > > Judging by the source code in the file 'GModelIO_MSH2.cpp' the > sequence is as follows (with Mesh.SaveAll=1, or no physical entities): > > $Elements > > points > lines > triangles > quads > polygons > tets > hexas > prisms > ... > > I just wanted to verify that i got this right and if this sequence is > somehow future proof, so that newer versions won't break this, since > I'd like to rely on this sequence for my parser. >
Gmsh will continue to save elements in that order; but the format does not enforce it... > Best regards, > > Benjamin Isbarn > > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine Tetrahedron V, July 4-5 2016: http://tetrahedron.montefiore.ulg.ac.be Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
