Hi Danny, You specified the transfinite interpolation corners in an incompatible way between the surfaces and the volumes. For simple surfaces (with 3/4 vertices) you actually don't have to specify them by hand: here's your file, simplified:
Test2.geo
Description: Binary data
Christophe > On 13 May 2017, at 13:39, Danny Lathouwers - TNW <d.lathouw...@tudelft.nl> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am trying to build a geometry consisting of 3 blocks connected. > The blocks should have stretched meshes (as seen when generating 2D meshes in > the attached geo). > > I failed when attempting to do the 3D. At first I removed the interconnecting > surfaces between the blocks so that the complete volume could be meshed. > That did not work (perhaps too complex, too many surfaces involved?). > > In a second try, I added these interconnecting surfaces and generate the > volumes separately as in the Test.geo. Even the first block fails to generate > (incompatible surface message). This seems to be something I am doing wrong? > > Even if this can be made to work I will probably end up with 3 non-connected > meshes right? This woud not be what I want. Can these then be connected? > > Could you give me a hand with this geometry/mesh? > > Thanks very much ! > Danny. > > > <Test.geo>_______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > gmsh@onelab.info > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh -- Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info
_______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list gmsh@onelab.info http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
