On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 12:00 +0200, Zuheyr Alsalihi wrote:
> Thank you I appreciated it very much.
> Prof. Geuzaine indicated me a solution in the follow-up.
>
> As i mentioned in my reply to his email below, I was confused/did not think,
> that the CPS6 type surface element
> with its own ID is one of the faces of a 3D C3D10 type tetrahedra element
> who has another ID.
I would like to comment on this. I find the way that CalculiX treats all this
very awkard, and leads users
into situations like what happens to you. Gmsh's approach is far superior. I do
not understand why
many many users keep on with codes like CalculiX that take all the FEA stuff
back to the 70s.
> So looping over the tagged physical group surface elements is what I need to
> do!
Actually, this should be done on the FEA solver side, not on the user side.
But again, there are people that are happy with FORTRAN.
--
jeremy theler
www.seamplex.com
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
