Ok, just tried it. What I get is:

1) From tools->statistics: 24122 Nodes, 124740 elements

2) In mesh file V2: 22689 nodes, 147030 elements

3) In mesh file V4: 24092 nodes, 147030 elements.

The number of elements is ok (the one in the mesh file includes elements of 
type 2), but there are still perhaps some inconsistencies in the number of 
nodes...?



-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: Christophe Geuzaine [mailto:cgeuza...@uliege.be] 
Inviato: giovedì 30 agosto 2018 14:44
A: Alessandro Vicini
Cc: gmsh@onelab.info
Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Mesh file format v4



> On 30 Aug 2018, at 13:21, Alessandro Vicini <alessandro.vic...@sitael.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ok, thanks.
> 
> At present, is it possible to know in advance which are the nodes not used in 
> elements, or is it necessary to look at the elements connectivity list?

The patch has been merged - give the new automatic snapshot a try.


> 
> A.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Christophe Geuzaine [mailto:cgeuza...@uliege.be]
> Inviato: giovedì 30 agosto 2018 13:19
> A: Alessandro Vicini
> Cc: gmsh@onelab.info
> Oggetto: Re: [Gmsh] Mesh file format v4
> 
> 
> 
>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 11:33, Alessandro Vicini <alessandro.vic...@sitael.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I generate a mesh using the latest v4.0 executable. If I look at the 
>> statistics I see 24207 nodes and 125393 tetrahedra.
>> I export the mesh file using both v2 and v4 ascii formats. Now, in the v2 
>> format file I see:
>> 
>> $Nodes
>> 22775
>> 
>> While in the v4 format file I see:
>> 
>> $Nodes
>> 887 24177
>> 
>> My question is: why the total number of nodes is different in the two files, 
>> and why is it different from what I see in the statistics?
> 
> In MSH4 we currently save some nodes that are generated but not used in 
> elements: this will be fixed in the next bug fix release.
> 
> 
>> By the way, if I generate the mesh with version 3.0.6 I obtain a different 
>> number of nodes and tetrahedral using the same meshing options; do I have to 
>> expect this?
> 
> Yes: the algorithms have been reworked a lot, so you should expect a 
> (slightly) different number of elements.
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> A.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmsh mailing list
>> gmsh@onelab.info
>> https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fonelab.info%2Fmailman%2F
>> l istinfo%2Fgmsh&e=3f60b0be&h=de5e6be7&f=y&p=y
> 
> —
> Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
> University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
> https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.montefiore.ulg.ac.be%
> 2F~geuzaine&e=3f60b0be&h=b241737e&f=y&p=y
> 
> Free software: 
> https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgmsh.info&e=3f60b0be&h=c9
> b82a87&f=y&p=y | 
> https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgetdp.info&e=3f60b0be&h=f
> e10bdd6&f=y&p=y | 
> https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fonelab.info&e=3f60b0be&h=
> 8512c144&f=y&p=y

—
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.montefiore.ulg.ac.be%2F~geuzaine&e=3f60b0be&h=b241737e&f=y&p=y

Free software: 
https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgmsh.info&e=3f60b0be&h=c9b82a87&f=y&p=y
 | 
https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fgetdp.info&e=3f60b0be&h=fe10bdd6&f=y&p=y
 | 
https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fonelab.info&e=3f60b0be&h=8512c144&f=y&p=y

_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
gmsh@onelab.info
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to