> On 10 Oct 2018, at 19:09, Herzig Ivo (herziivo) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there an option to write physical surfaces to individual files (preferably
> STL)? e.g. if I have physical surfaces "inlet" and "outlet" and I want to
> write them to "inlet.stl" and "outlet.stl" files.
As guillaume said, when physical groups are defined, by default Gmsh only saves
those mesh elements that belong to physical groups. You can thus indeed use
this feature to selectively save what you need.
I have added a "removePhysicalGroups" function in the api to make this easy:
you can now do:
model.mesh.generate(2)
model.addPhysicalGroup(2, [37], 100) # inlet
gmsh.write("inlet.stl")
model.removePhysicalGroups()
model.addPhysicalGroup(2, [42], 200) # inlet
gmsh.write("outlet.stl")
>
> Another option would be to write them to a single STL file but in separate
> solids named after the Physical surfaces, but I don't think gmsh can do that
> either?
>
Is this supported by the STL format? If it is, we could indeed modify our STL
writer to create multiple "solids" (that's easy to code - see
Geo/GModelIO_STL.cpp : don't hesitate to submit merge request in our gitlab
with an implementation).
Note that since you are using the API, you could also simply iterate on the
surfaces you are interested in, and just write the STL yourself for each part.
Christophe
> Is there an Option I missed that does this? Or a command line switch?
>
> Thanks for your help!
> Ivo
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
—
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
Free software: http://gmsh.info | http://getdp.info | http://onelab.info
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
