Hi Johannes,

I can't reproduce the crashes when deleting the curves... Your file also seems 
very complicated. I would just do:

SetFactory("OpenCASCADE");
Geometry.OCCTargetUnit = "M";
v() = ShapeFromFile("wing_fuselage.step");
Box(3) = {-5, -5, -5, 10, 10, 10};
out() = BooleanDifference{ Volume{3}; Delete; }{ Volume{v()}; Delete; };

out() will contain the volume of interest.

Christophe


> On 27 Mar 2019, at 19:29, Johannes Dillinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I'm looking for a suitable way to "quickly" generate Euler meshes for SU2 CFD 
> analysis.
> So the usual setup is a (hopefully rather simple) STEP model of a 
> wing-fusleage part for example, that I want to mesh in GMSH.
> 
> I attached a sample STEP and the geo-file that I have been working on, but I 
> cant seem to find the errors..
>       • First I merge the STEP-file and reverse some surfaces (that 
> apparently are oriented in the wrong direction)..
>       • I generate a surface loop of the outer surfaces for defining outer 
> volume later on. Here the first weird thing happens: the loop command 
> generates surfaces 17, 18, and curves 39-44
>       • I delete surfaces 17 and 18, since they later on will make problems 
> otherwise
>       • I also delete the imported volumes
> 
> I then generate a farfield/bounding box, and also here, the loop command 
> generates additional surfaces 1007 to 1010, and I cant figure out why.. 
> Anyway, I again delte those, since they will cause problems otherwise.
> 
> The last problem which really stops me from continuing is the outer volume 
> that I generate with the "Volume" command in line 50. This one again 
> generates a surface 1009, that I cant delete anymore..
> So the surface will be 2D meshed and maybe then leads to the problem that the 
> outer volume cannot be meshed.
> 
> I guess thats enough questions and porblems for now. Once solved, it would be 
> great if you could help me with mesh density and so on (already in the geo 
> though), but thats for later..:-)
> 
> So, to sum up:
>       • is the general methodology I use ok?
>       • how can I avoid the additional surfaces and curves to be created?
>       • which problem still exists that does not allow for the 3D mesh 
> generation?
> Thank you so much in advance!
> Best regards,
> 
> Johannes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <wing_fuselage.geo><wing_fuselage.step>_______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

— 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine




_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to