> On 1 May 2019, at 11:29, Jeremy Theler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 09:40 +0200, Christophe Geuzaine wrote: >>> >>> I'm currently able to read the components into Gmsh and label them >>> with the `Physical Volume` syntax. The issue is that the surface >>> mesh elements at the boundaries do not line up with one another; >>> the elements in one component are not connected to the elements in >>> another. >>> >> >> You need to fuse the two surfaces: this can be achieved with the >> "fragment" operation - see attached file. > > Would there be any difference by just using Coherence?
It's the same (with OpenCASCADE "Coherence" simply does "fragment" with all the entities of highest dimension in the model). Christophe > > > -- > jeremy theler > www.seamplex.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh — Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
