> On 27 Jun 2019, at 03:33, Gib Bogle <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have been testing with the demo file cube.geo: > > lc = 0.3; > Point(1) = {0.0,0.0,0.0,lc}; > Point(2) = {1,0.0,0.0,lc}; > Point(3) = {1,1,0.0,lc}; > Point(4) = {0,1,0.0,lc}; > Line(1) = {4,3}; > Line(2) = {3,2}; > Line(3) = {2,1}; > Line(4) = {1,4}; > Line Loop(5) = {2,3,4,1}; > Plane Surface(6) = {5}; > tmp[] = Extrude {0,0.0,1} { > Surface{6}; > }; > Physical Volume(1) = tmp[1]; > > I generate the mesh file at the command line like this: > > gmsh -3 cube.geo > > on a Windows 7 machine and on Ubuntu 16.04. The gmsh version is 4.3.0. > > I find that the meshes created on the two systems are a bit different. On > Windows the mesh has 137 nodes and 372 elements, while on Ubuntu it has 136 > nodes and 373 elements. > > Should I be concerned about this?
No, on the same machine the meshes should be identical, but across OSes (and different compilers) small variations are normal. Christophe > > Thanks > Gib > _______________________________________________ > gmsh mailing list > [email protected] > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh — Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
