Good morning,
 The tutorial t7.geo reports an example in which the mesh density is defined in 
a view consisting of scalar triangles. This kind data structure does not 
enforce the continuity of the scalar field over adjacent triangles.  But if the 
mesh is isotropic and conformal its density should be a continuous scalar 
field. So, to me, it seems more natural (and more efficient) to define the mesh 
density in a view (or a pos file) consisting of scalar points.
 Would it be OK to use such kind of view as a background mesh ?
 Thanks Walter  Steffè 
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to