> On 18 Oct 2019, at 13:25, Praveen C <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> I was using “Compound Line” in some cases which is now removed.
>
> My use was something like this
>
> Compound Line(10) = {5,6};
> Compound Line(11) = {7,8};
>
> Transfinite Line{10,11} = na;
>
> and full example is attached.
>
> Now I have to use “Compound Curve” but this does not create a new curve
> number which I need as in above example.
>
> How I can deal with this situation ?
That's indeed a use-case that the new compound meshing constraints do not cover.
I have just added a new "Compound Spline/BSpline" command so that you can
achieve similar results as before; simply by creating a new Spline/BSpline
curve based on sampling of the "sub curves":
Compound BSpline(10) = {5,6} Using 100; // 100 intervals on curves 5 and 6 to
create control points for the bspline 10
Compound BSpline(11) = {7,8} Using 100;
Give it a try with the latest dev snapshot.
Christophe
>
> Thanks
> praveen
>
> <naca_struct2.geo>
> _______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
—
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine
_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
