> On 19 Nov 2019, at 14:56, Maurice Rohracker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear GMSH users and developers,
> 
> For a project at the University Erlangen-Nürnberg, I would like to mesh some 
> geometry with randomly generated inclusions in a box (as you can see in the 
> attachment) to get a relatively structured quadrilateral mesh with good 
> quality using this then for FE simulations. We are using therefor the python 
> API.
> 
> Right now, we get as a result in most cases these diamond elements, which 
> some of them have very large angles up to 180 degrees or very acute angles. 
> How can I avoid these and get a much better quality mesh?
> 
> Here are the adjustments we’re using right now. 
> 
> Mesh.Algorithm: 9 -  Packing of Parallelograms 
> Mesh.RecombineAll: 1 - quad elements
> Mesh.SubdivisionAlgorithm: 1 - all quads
> Mesh.RecombinationAlgorithm: 2 - simple quad (the mesh result didn’t get even 
> better for different adjustments)
> We specify the mesh size at the points. Especially at the four corner points 
> (0.3) and at the 3 points on the circles (0.12), where the size of the box is 
> 10x10 and the radius 0.5.
> 
> Do have any tips to improve the quality, are there adjustments missing (like 
> transfinite) or anything else. It doesn’t have to be fully structured, but we 
> try to get as far as possible, especially we don’t want to have large or 
> small angles.
> 

I would use this, which seems fine :

Attachment: input_Geom_new.geo
Description: Binary data



> If needed I also can share the .msh file.
> 
> Thank you very much in advance.
> 
> Best regards
> Maurice Rohracker
> Master student Computational Engineering FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg
> 
> <input_Geom.geo><geometry.png><mesh.png>_______________________________________________
> gmsh mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

— 
Prof. Christophe Geuzaine
University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 
http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine



_______________________________________________
gmsh mailing list
[email protected]
http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh

Reply via email to