> On 18 Feb 2020, at 11:35, Komal Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you for the clarification. Is there any other way to compute plane > surface in this type of problems with large variation in z values?
There is no plane surface that goes through the points you specified... Christophe > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:00 PM Christophe Geuzaine <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:06, Komal Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am generating msh file in version 4.3.0 and exporting it in version 2 > > ASCII format because I have written code to read 2.2 0 8 MeshFormat. In it > > some of the z-coordinate are showing negative values. However, if I am > > generating msh file in version 2.7.0 using the same geo file used earlier, > > no negative values is there but appropriate Physical names are not coming.I > > am attaching geo file ad msh file of both version. Please let me know how > > to tackle negative z values. > > > > Your "plane surface" is not plane: the z-coordinates of points on its > boundary range from 1 to 102. > > Newer versions of Gmsh compute the "best" plane surface computed in the > least-square sense. > > Christophe > > > <xyz_full.geo><xyz_version_2.7.msh><xyz_version_4_format_2.2>_______________________________________________ > > gmsh mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh > > — > Prof. Christophe Geuzaine > University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 1 > http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine > > > — Prof. Christophe Geuzaine University of Liege, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science http://www.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~geuzaine _______________________________________________ gmsh mailing list [email protected] http://onelab.info/mailman/listinfo/gmsh
