Hi,
I answer to the gmx-users mailing list and I would be pleased if further
correspondence is done there.
It's an installation issue because the CMAP directive is not recognized by
pdb2gmx. Seems like you are running version 4.0.7 and that is then the
explanation. You need to run with the developing version (because it is has not
been released yet) from git to run with CHARMM. There're installation
instructions on the gromacs webpage.
Worth to note:
1. more information about the port is available in paper by yours
sincerely and coworkers (Bjelkmar et al. Journal of Chemical Theory and
Computation, 2010)
2. the force field format has been changed and the most recent version
of the force field (complying to this new format) was added to the source. I.e.
you should use those files (not the ffcharmm27* files from my homepage).
Regards,
Pär Bjelkmar
5 apr 2010 kl. 17.51 skrev Smiruthi Ramasubramanian:
> Hi Pär,
>
> I've been testing the charmm27 forcefield and keep getting this error:
>
> Program pdb2gmx, VERSION 4.0.7
> Source code file: resall.c, line: 344
>
> Fatal error:
> in .rtp file in residue cmap at line:
> -C N CA C +N
>
> I couldn't find a plausible solution in the gmx forums and was wondering if
> there was a problem in the installation. I am not using ACE or other capping
> residues in the pdb.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Smiruthi
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:00 AM, Pär Bjelkmar <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Smiruthi,
>
> Nice to hear that you're interested in the port. First, you need to run with
> the git head version (see instructions on my page
> www.dbb.su.se/User:bjelkmar/Ffcharmm or on gromacs.org). Since about one
> month, the version of the force field (version 1.1) on this homepage has not
> been working with git head because the force field format was changed in
> GROMACS. Yesterday, I committed the updated version of the CHARMM parameters
> to the version-tracking program (git) in the head branch so it should work
> now. However, this is still a somewhat work-in-progress force field port
> (especially in the nucleic acid part) and there _might_ be changes (although
> minor ones for sure) until GROMACS 4.1 is released. The protein and lipid
> parts should be fairly safe to use though.
>
> Regards and good luck,
> Pär Bjelkmar
>
> 16 mar 2010 kl. 20.20 skrev Smiruthi Ramasubramanian:
>
>> Hi Pär,
>>
>> I am a Phd student in Rudy Lab (http://rudylab.wustl.edu/) at Wustl. We are
>> working on comparing NAMD and Gromacs umbrella sampling related to passage
>> of ions through membrane proteins. Could you please send me the Charmm port
>> files listed in http://www.dbb.su.se/User:Bjelkmar/Ffcharmm . Unfortunately,
>> I keep getting "Internal Error" and I am not sure if it is a problem at our
>> end or if your server is temporarily down.
>>
>> I apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate the help.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Smiruthi
>
>
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php
