On 15/04/2010 7:11 PM, Ramachandran G wrote:
Hello Par:
        Using the latest git i could able to work on my  oxy-hemoglobin
system with new gromacs version 4.0.5 successfully. But since my new
gromacs version was not installed in parallel i tried using older
version of gromacs 3.3.1 which was installed in parrallel. While doing
grompp to get the *.tpr file, i am getting the below error.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program grompp, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: topdirs.c, line: 103

Fatal error:
Invalid dihedral type 9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't bother with 3.3.1 at all, and don't install 4.0.5 (which has had many bugs fixed in 4.0.7). Just wait for 4.0.7 to be installed.

Firstly, you have the above compatibility problem. Secondarily, the way parallel simulations are managed has changed significantly. Search the GROMACS webpage for discussion here.

Mark

I am planning to install the newer gromacs version also in parallel but
in the mean time i also wanted  to rectify the above error, if i can.
Thank you.

Rama


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Pär Bjelkmar <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi,

    I have now added the charmm files to git head and the protein and
    lipid parts should work at least. Simply check out the latest git
    and the charmm parameters should show up in pdb2gmx.

    /Pär

    11 mar 2010 kl. 03.04 skrev Ramachandran G:

    Hello Bjelkumar,
             Thanks for your reply. I will wait until you add the new
    force field to the git.

    regards,
    rama

    On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Pär Bjelkmar <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hello,

        I have that on my schedule for next week. That is to add the
        new force field format to the git source code tree. Until then
        you could use the old format if you checkout a previous
        version of the source code. I guess you know about git
        otherwise there's some info here
        http://www.gromacs.org/Developer_Zone/Git/Basic_Git_Usage

        So start by getting a copy of the latest _developing_ version
        (git head) of gromacs source code:
        $ git clone [email protected]:gromacs.git
        The force field files were update in end of January to you
        could checkout a version from Jan 27 by:
        $ git checkout d80138d720fd41a5005238adecd5bfd5400e524c

        then compile. Now it should work if you got the HEME
        parameters from Michel. Alternatively you wait until end of
        next week when I think I have had time to add the new force
        field format to the git head.

        Good luck!
        /Pär

        1 mar 2010 kl. 21.21 skrev Ramachandran G:

        Dear Pär Bjelkmar,
                 After getting help from Michel Cuendet still i am
        facing problem and i
        understood that in groamcs latest version 4.0.x  problems may
        come due to CMAP.
        He suggested me to seek your help. Could you help me to get
        new toplogy
        format charmm files which can adapt the HEME sections to that.
        Thank you.

        Rama

        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
        From: *Michel Cuendet* <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        Date: Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:03 PM
        Subject: Re: ffcharmm27 for HEME
        To: Ramachandran G <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>



        Dear Mr. Ramachandran,

        This means you are using grompp from the distribution version
        4.0.x.
        This version of gromacs does not know about the CMAP
        forcefield term.
        You have two options :

        1) Deactivate CMAP. This would be equivalent to using the
        charmm22 ff
        instead of the charmm27, which many people consider fine. To
        do this,
        edit the file ffcharmm27.rtp and delete all [cmap] sections. This
        _should_ work.

        2) Download the git development version, which knows how to
        handle CMAP.
        I know they have been changing topology formats in the latest
        versions,
        but I hope it is still able to read the old topologies.
        Otherwise, you
        will have to ask Par Bjelkmar for the charmm files in the new
        topology
        format, and adapt the HEME sections to that.

        Sorry it is a bit messy at the moment. But everything should
        become part
        of the gormacs4.1 distribution.

        Bye,
        Michel

        Ramachandran G wrote:
        > Dear Mr. Michel,
        >         Thank you very much for you help and time.
        > Although i could able to do pdb2gmx and get the *.top file
        still, i
        > have problem in getting the 'tpr' file using grompp. This
        is due the
        > 'cmap'
        >
        > I would try to fix the problem myself but still if the
        problem persist
        > then i will get back to you. Thank you again.
        >
        > regards,
        > Rama
        >
        > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Michel Cuendet
        > <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
        >
        >
        >     Dear Mr. Ramachandran,
        >
        >     Attached is a tar file containing the ffcharmm27
        forcefield files
        >     modified for the HEME and an optional CO ligand.
        >
        >     Note that I also wanted to add the O2 ligand, but the
        original charmm
        >     parameters seem to be inconsistent. For example, the
        FE-OM-OM angle is
        >     180deg, which is wrong. And there is no angle defined
        for NH2-FE-OM,
        >     while a strong angle is required to keep the ligands
        axial. So we have
        >     corrected this and guessed a couple of missing
        parameters for our own
        >     use. But I do not include them to the official ffcharmm27
        >     distribution,
        >     which should stay as close as possible to the original
        charmm
        >     force field.
        >
        >     There is a subtlety with the histidine binding to HEME.
        The Charmm
        >     patch
        >     PHEM defines a dihedral term only with NA and not with
        NB,NC, or ND.
        >     ;       1CD2  1NE2  2FE  2NA       (1 = HSD, 2 = HEME)
        >     In gromacs we cannot differentiate between NA, NB, NC,
        and ND of the
        >     heme (and special values cannot be attributed in the
        rtp file for
        >     dihedrals involving atoms from other residues). Given
        the symmetry of
        >     the HEME we can distribute the dihedral over NA, NB,
        NC, and ND. So we
        >     divide the original force constant (0.2092) by four.
        This should give
        >     pretty much the same behavior in practice.
        >
        >     In order to treat the HEME with pdb2gmx, you have to
        (assuming the
        >     HEME
        >     is covalently bound to an histidine in chain A):
        >
        >     1) Attribute HEME to chain A (Covalent bonds only
        within one chain)
        >
        >     2) Move HEME to end of chain A (all atoms of one chain
        have to be
        >     consecutive for gromacs)
        >
        >     See the attached pdb file as an example.
        >
        >     I hope it will work. Do not hesitate to contact me if
        you have any
        >     additional questions,
        >
        >     Best regards,
        >     Michel
        >
        >
        >
        > > *Från: *Ramachandran G <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
        > > *Datum: *22 februari 2010 23.56.42 CET
        > > *Till: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
        > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
        > > *Ämne: **ffcharmm*
        > >
        > > Hi Pär Bjelkmar,
        > >      Thank you for the charmm force field patches for
        gromacs. It is
        > > very much useful for me. However presently i am facing a
        problem
        >     since
        > > these force fields do not  have 'HEME' group in it.  I
        tried to
        >     add it
        > > manually but unsuccessful. Could you help me in adding
        the HEME
        >     group
        > > to the ffcharmm patches. Your help would be highly
        appreciated.
        > >
        > >
        > > Ramachandran. G
        > > --
        > > Postdoctoral Research Scholar,
        > > Department of Chemistry,
        > > University of Nevada, Reno.
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > --
        > Postdoctoral Research Scholar,
        > Department of Chemistry,
        > University of Nevada, Reno.




        --
        Postdoctoral Research Scholar,
        Department of Chemistry,
        University of Nevada, Reno.




    --
    Postdoctoral Research Scholar,
    Department of Chemistry,
    University of Nevada, Reno.





--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/mailing_lists/users.php

Reply via email to