2011/4/10 Mark Abraham <[email protected]>: > On 10/04/2011 11:44 AM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote: >> >> Maybe this is unrelated to the underlying problem, but hopefully it helps >> in the long run. Nothing worse than a reviewer saying, "Nice project, but >> 100% of the data are junk." > > "Bad idea, and 100% of the data are junk" ? :-)
Well, in this case you're not going to be scooped -while in the first case you have wasted your time AND someone else will redo your project (correctly) while you wait for your paper review to come back. m. -- gmx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected]. Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
