Steven Neumann wrote:


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    Steven Neumann wrote:

        I run energy minimization of my protein with implicit solvent:
constraints = none

           integrator = steep

           dt = 0.001 ; ps

           nsteps = 30000

           vdwtype = cut-off

           coulombtype = cut-off

           pbc = no

           nstlist = 0

           ns_type = simple

           rlist = 0 ; this means all-vs-all (no cut-off),

           which gets expensive for bigger systems

           rcoulomb = 0

           rvdw = 0

           comm-mode = angular

           comm-grps = Protein

           optimize_fft = yes

           ;

           ; Energy minimizing stuff

           ;

           emtol =

           5.0

           emstep = 0.01

           ;

           ; Implicit solvent

           ;

           implicit_solvent = GBSA

           gb_algorithm = OBC

           nstgbradii = 1

           rgbradii = 0 ; [nm] Cut-off for the calculation of the

           Born radii. Currently must be equal to rlist

           gb_epsilon_solvent = 80 ; Dielectric constant for the
        implicit solvent

           ; gb_saltconc = 0 ; Salt concentration for implicit solvent

           models, currently not used

           sa_algorithm = Ace-approximation

           sa_surface_tension = 2.25936

         And I obtained:
Steepest Descents:

        Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.00000e+03

        Number of steps = 30000

        Step Time Lambda

        0 0.00000 0.00000

         

        Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 1000 in 1 steps

        Potential Energy = inf

        Maximum force = 0.0000000e+00 on atom 0

        Norm of force = nan

Can you please explain?


    Not without more information.

    1. What is in the system?     - protein without specified box
    2. Which version of Gromacs is this?    - Gromacs 4.5.4
    3. Are you using GPU or CPU architecture?   - I run it straight from
    the cluster on a specific node

Doesn't answer the question, but I'll assume CPU since EM doesn't work on GPU's. Just checking.

    4. Does an in vacuo minimization work (i.e., just turn off the GB
    parts)?  - yes, it works


And what is the output?

In any case, I can't reproduce any problem doing EM with implicit solvent in 4.5.4 - my test systems work quite well. It may just be that the system cannot be minimized because of some clash that is unfavorable in an implicit solvent environment (thus causing an immediate halt, though that would be odd) but can be resolved in vacuo. Try using the structure produced by in vacuo minimization as input into the implicit solvent EM to see if this may be the case.


What shoould be the value for emtol in implicit solvent model with protein with app. 150 residues?


One that is sufficient for the inherent forces in the system and for your application ;) I don't think there are any hard and fast rules here for standard MD, and the target is not dictated by the size of the protein.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to