On 8/22/12 9:12 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the output, I
found the following line:
368 4.295 3.8840018217
I just wondering how could it possible fro residue 368 with a value of 3.88?
My guess would be that this particular lipid is probably bound very tightly to
some protein residue, which leads to the protein and lipid both contributing to
the lateral area in that region. In this case, the protein contributes more
area than the lipid does. You should look at the coordinate file and see what
this residue is doing.
For the pure lipids/water case, my apology for this since I forgot to change the
box size values but the protein/lipids case is with correct box size.
That's good news. It's always alarming to hear someone say that your work may
not be reliable when you've done lots of work to ensure that it is ;)
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
