hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still
curious for the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13
which are the same weired to me. here is the screen shot for this residue.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/56271062/1.jpg
thanks again for comments
Albert
On 08/22/2012 03:16 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/22/12 9:12 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the
output, I
found the following line:
368 4.295 3.8840018217
I just wondering how could it possible fro residue 368 with a value
of 3.88?
My guess would be that this particular lipid is probably bound very
tightly to some protein residue, which leads to the protein and lipid
both contributing to the lateral area in that region. In this case,
the protein contributes more area than the lipid does. You should
look at the coordinate file and see what this residue is doing.
--
gmx-users mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to [email protected].
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
