@ Justin,

Thank you, that worked like a charm!  (Using increased vanderwal distance)

Xu Dong Huang
Chemical & Biochemical Engineering
Rutgers School of Engineering 
xudo...@eden.rutgers.edu 

On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Xu Dong Huang <xudo...@eden.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> Everytime I remove the atom that is causing the INF force, it gives me new 
> atom that causes INF force. (The ones that come up are all water beads that 
> are causing the infinite force), does that mean when i did genbox it inserted 
> water incorrectly? (Because I viewed it in VMD< it's certainly not 
> overlapping with my solute. )
> 
> Xu Dong Huang
> Chemical & Biochemical Engineering
> Rutgers School of Engineering 
> xudo...@eden.rutgers.edu 
> 
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Xu Dong Huang <xudo...@eden.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Dear users,
>> 
>> Now I fixed the initial structure error, and I solvated it in water (martini 
>> bead model), and i run typical EM, I get the following error: 
>> 
>> Steepest Descents:
>>  Tolerance (Fmax)   =  1.00000e+01
>>  Number of steps    =        50000
>> Step=   14, Dmax= 1.2e-06 nm, Epot=  4.48322e+19 Fmax=         inf, atom= 
>> 14524
>> Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
>> Converged to machine precision,
>> but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10
>> 
>> Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.
>> 
>> writing lowest energy coordinates.
>> 
>> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
>> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
>> Potential Energy  =  4.4832208e+19
>> Maximum force     =            inf on atom 14524
>> Norm of force     =            inf
>> 
>> gcq#182: "That Was Cool" (Beavis and Butthead)
>> 
>> -----My EM.mdp file contains the following: 
>> integrator               = steep
>> dt                       = 0.020
>> nsteps                   = 50000 ;Note: 100 steps is to much for a vacuum 
>> run (nsteps=10)
>> 
>> nstlog                   = 1000
>> nstenergy                = 500
>> nstxtcout                = 500
>> 
>> nstlist                  = 10
>> ns_type                  = grid
>> pbc                      = xyz
>> periodic_molecules       = no
>> rlist                    = 1.4
>> 
>> coulombtype              = Shift
>> rcoulomb_switch          = 0.0
>> rcoulomb                 = 1.2
>> epsilon_r                = 15
>> epsilon_rf               = 1
>> vdw_type                 = Shift
>> rvdw_switch              = 0.9
>> rvdw                     = 1.2
>> 
>> My system size 73191 W, and 1 star (consisted of 101 atoms)
>> I read somewhere that it's that atom 14524 is overlapping… I can't visually 
>> see anything complicated in my VMD since the system is pretty big 
>> 
>> Xu Dong Huang
>> Chemical & Biochemical Engineering
>> Rutgers School of Engineering 
>> xudo...@eden.rutgers.edu 
>> 
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> * Please search the archive at 
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> 
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at 
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to