On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:44:22PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > execute_state_reverse() calls execute_state(), and then > execute_state() calls execute(). so m->add_display_object() is always > called in execute(). How can we know if add_display_object() is > called in reverse execution or not if we don't have a another > variable?
What about adding an execute_state_reversed() to know we're being executed in "reverse" mode ? It's still dirty, but moves the dirtiness where it's already dirty enough :) --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
