On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 10:01:47AM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > I'd say tu_timer is clear and simple enough and with enough commentary > there. "lack of classes documentation" is unfair this time:) > > I just give my vote for tu_timer against boost_date_time, it makes my > programming easier at the moment.
Markus, please get tu_timer back till we found an agreement. We'd better have developers focused on real tasks (and there are a lot) :) --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
