Hello Sandro, Tuesday, October 30, 2007, 10:37:39 AM, you wrote: SS> If you remember I asked you "do you have setMask in mind" when you SS> added the new intelligence.
Yes, my answer was: I don't know much about setMask() :) SS> Maybe time to prove it against setMask now ? Sure, but you'll have to wait (lack of time) :( SS> Note that dynamic masks (set by setMask) do not have to be in the SS> same DisplayList at all ! (but I belive we don't have an automated SS> test for this yet) Uhm... that may be a problem. But in any case the add_invalidated_bounds() method is strongly related to the display() method, i.e. instead of calling renderer mask methods and display() of childs, it calls add_invalidated_bounds() of the childs and handles the masks internally. So, any changes to display() should also be replicated to add_invalidated_bounds(). Hmm, might be worth to add a comment about this relationship in both methods. Udo _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
