On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:32:52AM +0100, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: > Hello strk, > > Monday, November 12, 2007, 10:16:16 AM, you wrote: > >> But would also mean a lot of memory copies. Closing on the usage side > >> would just be an additional final check. > > It's not that easy. Other than the need to know if it is a dynamic > shape it also complicates the check because you have a point that does > not come from the array. So no more > > const edge& edg = pth.m_edges[eno]; > > s> Another problem (which is present already, since we're closign the > s> path) is that distance from the stroke should *not* be checked on > s> the virtual (added for closing) edge. So point_test (and maybe the > s> renderer too) should know what's a real edge and what's just a > s> virtual one. > > Why is that wrong? The p.p. also closes the stroke for unfinished > paths...
Uh ? Show me ? Aren't we talking about drawing a filled open shape in a frame and continuing it on next frame ? --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list Gnash-commit@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
