On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 10:57:24AM +0100, Udo Giacomozzi wrote: > Hello strk, > > Monday, November 12, 2007, 10:35:14 AM, you wrote: > s> Maybe we can remember wheter we changed the shape due to forced > s> closing or not, and if we did we can wipe out the last edge on next > s> editing. Still the stroke thing remains, unless we always close > s> using an new path (with m_new_shape=false and lineStyle=0). > > What we need are two *views* of the definiton. One view is for all > ActionScript stuff and exactly matches what the user defines. The > second view is for the renderer and point test algorithm (and who > knows what else). We should not mix them up. > > Can't we simply change the "path" class so that it provides addition > access methods? I mean a new version of size() and at():
Do you really think it would be simple ? I haven't closely looked at it but I belive a lot of code accesses edges directly... --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list Gnash-commit@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
