On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 03:59:19PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > > Doesn't one of the redesign attempts account for this ? > > One was: "keep info about which static character belongs to each frame" > > mc3 was placed in frame 4 and still alive, we're jumping to frame 5 > > so why should we build it again ? I guess its just the 'ratio' thing > > preventing that, right ? > > > > The problem is not ratio. It is mc1 and mc3 occupy the same depth. > When jumping back, mc1 need to be constructed again, which need a > depth already occupied by mc3. We don't know where to place mc1 at > construction time when jumping back. (Of course, to solve this single > case is not difficult, but it hurts current design)
Do we really need to construct it or simply calling initialize handler does it ? The handler itself shouldn't be able to find mc1 anyway, right ? --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list Gnash-commit@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
