> I belive current GNash renders mask-textfield-6.swf exactly > as shown by the associated .png
That's completely possible, and then probably could pass my test code, since both of them test the same thing(TextField instance as a mask). Forget it if you are already satisfied :) (+ // swfdec/test/image/mask-textfield-6.swf shows that setMask should also + // work against TextFields) I was just not quite agree with the above docs. setMask() still works on sprite instead of TextField instance in that test. eg: text.setMask(sprite). --zou On Jan 8, 2008 3:43 PM, Sandro Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:40:23AM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > > + // swfdec/test/image/mask-textfield-6.swf shows that setMask should > > also > > + // work against TextFields, we have no tests for other > > character types so > > + // we generalize it for any character. > > + boost::intrusive_ptr<character> maskee = > > ensureType<character>(fn.this_ptr); > > > > I checked swfdec/test/image/mask-textfield-6.swf. It tests that > > TextField instances could be a mask(not maskee). Actually the > > behaviour when setMask work against TextField instance is odd to me, > > maybe UdoG knows more about it. > > But yes, setMask not only works for sprites, but also for button > > instances as I tested. > > I belive current GNash renders mask-textfield-6.swf exactly > as shown by the associated .png > --strk; > _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
