> What I meant is you do can call setMask as if it was a TextField > method... then confirmed, that's right. This sentence is clear to me:) Sorry about the misreading if I did.
--zou On Jan 8, 2008 4:11 PM, Sandro Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 04:00:00PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote: > > > I belive current GNash renders mask-textfield-6.swf exactly > > > as shown by the associated .png > > > > That's completely possible, and then probably could pass my test > > code, since both of them test the same thing(TextField instance as a > > mask). Forget it if you are already satisfied :) > > > > (+ // swfdec/test/image/mask-textfield-6.swf shows that setMask > > should also > > + // work against TextFields) > > > > I was just not quite agree with the above docs. setMask() still > > works on sprite instead of TextField instance in that test. eg: > > text.setMask(sprite). > > Eh... we're both non-english speakers :) > What I meant is you do can call setMask as if it was a TextField > method... > > > > > --zou > _______________________________________________ Gnash-commit mailing list Gnash-commit@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit
