strk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:03:51AM -0700, Rob Savoye wrote:
> 
>>> If we plan to allow for multiple GUIs in libgnashgui (and libgnashplayer)
>>> we should change the --enable-gui switch to accept a comma-separated
>>> list of guis, and update interface of Player to allow setting a 
>>> specific GUI for use.
>>  We should probably do this, but I think for this release we should just
>>  build klash and gtk. Since AGG is now fully functional, I'm debating
>> whether we should have the release build with gtk-agg instead of OpenGL.
> 
> I'm a supporter of AGG, as it supports more features then ogl (no text
> antialiasing problems and proper support for masks). Moreover, it is
> free-graphic-drivers-friendly.
> 
I'm a supporter of OGL but for now I think we miss two features that AGG
supports albeit it doesn't work as good as ol' OGL (and requires lots of
CPU on some platforms, i.e. MIPS/IRIX). So IMO we should stick to OGL as
default until next release.
>>   The bigger problem is that gui/klash doesn't work at all. The
>> Qapplication in kde.cpp must be initialized with argc and argv, and
>> without that, it never gets the Display right. For the release I'm
>> tempted to going back to building plugin/klash/klash instead, and we can
>> fix KDE support in CVS later.
> 
> Sounds good to me, multiple gui support doesn't seem a "well supported"
> feature to have into a release (even if alpha)
> 
Agree, what about disabling klash as default in 0.7.2?
> --strk;

//Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to