On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:12:36AM -0500, P T Withington wrote: > Does the file flasm? Or does flasm complain too?
flasm complains too. And Ming as well. I just committed a patch that seems to survive that malformation, but other problems occur so o I'm not sure about the fix. The best way to verify would be producing a much simpler SWF. BTW, the other problems seem to be in DEFINESHAPE3 handling. There is actually NO difference from DEFINESHAPE2 in the way Gnash handles it so it's surely a Gnash problem. If you can provide a simple SWF (a single shape) compiled in SWF6 and SWF7 ((or whatever SWF version instruduced DEFINESHAPE3) that might help tracking differences. --strk; > > On 2007-02-06, at 21:44 EST, Henry Minsky wrote: > > >On the file I sent you, can you figure out which instruction it > >what choking > >on (i.e., the byte offset into the uncompressed swf file?). I can > >send you > >an uncompressed swf if that would make it easier. > > > > > >On 2/6/07, Rob Savoye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>Henry Minsky wrote: > >> > >> On every single one of them I get this error still: > >>> 17:30:50: ERROR: swf_event::read(), event_length = 111, but read > >>110 > >>So then nothing else gets parsed right, so we'll have to look into > >>it. > >> > >> - rob - > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >-- > >Henry Minsky > >Software Architect > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev -- () ASCII Ribbon Campaign /\ Keep it simple! _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
