On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:34:28PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote: > It's got the entire runtime library in it, we don't attempt to link against > the runtime to only use functions which are referenced. It just prepends the > compiled runtime library to the compiled app. It's possible to compile the > app code separately if it would help debug the opcode bugs, but it won't do > anything useful when it runs without the runtime library.
It would help being able to produce the *simplest* SWF. Does the compiler only output actions or also normal blocks ? I mean, in the example code you send me (a single canvas), is the DEFINESHAPE tag used or it it drawn using calls to the runtime lib ? Is it possible to skip the runtime library ? --strk; > > > > On 2/12/07, strk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 06:15:45PM -0500, Henry Minsky wrote: > >> I haven't tried gcj for a long time, it did look very promising, but > >there > >> was always > >> one library or another that my apps would need for some pointless > >reason > >> that had not been implemented yet. Like you needed the AWT library in > >order > >> to do some math operation or something... > > > >The JTS Topology Suite is full of math, and builds fine with gcj. > >AWT shouldn't be needed if not for GUIs. > > > >Back on the topic... is it normal that a test so simple contains > >so much actions ? Flasm output is over 1 MB. Can you see it ? > > > >--strk; > > > > > > > > > -- > Henry Minsky > Software Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev -- () ASCII Ribbon Campaign /\ Keep it simple! _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
