> Which is one of the reasons I'm working on Cygnal again. Other than > just creating yet another video streaming server, (although Cygnal also > speaks RTMP*/HTTP/SWF) I'd like Cygnal to be more useful. I have > considered a bittorrent like protocol, maybe bittorrent, or maybe > something similar for distributed streaming. > Which is one of the reasons I'm working on Cygnal again. Other than > just creating yet another video streaming server, (although Cygnal also > speaks RTMP*/HTTP/SWF) I'd like Cygnal to be more useful. I have > considered a bittorrent like protocol, maybe bittorrent, or maybe > something similar for distributed streaming.
For providing pre-produced content (like movies) you could go for the Osprey approach. They use a special Bittorrent client called "Permaseed", which in fact is a trimmed down BT-client (but written from scratch) to act as server. The Osprey tracker only tells the clients that the Permaseed has a block if the block doesn't exist in the swarm anymore. That concept can be ported to a DHT system. The Permaseed checks the DHT tables if there are enough seeders for a block to make sure the block is available and distribution latencies are low. If there are enough seeders per leechers the Permaseed denies requests, otherweise it answers requests. So you can keep the upstream traffic low and don't need a complete BT client. Renne _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
