We have discussed this issue in Red5 community already. The result seems that it will only violate the patent if one creates both the client and the server. I believe this is not true for both Red5 and gnash. But I am not a lawyer of course. Forgive me if I was wrong. :-)
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Rob Savoye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > article: http://www.flashcomguru.com/index.cfm/2008/3/6/rtmp-patent > > The actual patent is at: http://www.google.com/patents?id=SGiBAAAAEBAJ > > - rob - > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev > -- Best Regards Steven Gong InfraRed5 Red5 Consultant: http://www.infrared5.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Red5 Developer: http://osflash.org/red5, http://jira.red5.org/confluence/display/~steven/Home Javaflash Project Founder and Maintainer: http://osflash.org/javaflash
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
