I don't think this is an issue, at least not for EU Citizens. So we might wanna move the domain and the machines to a .eu... *Sight* Any clues of the implications of this?
//Markus On 20 Mar 2008, at 14:39, Rob Savoye wrote:
Steven Gong wrote:We have discussed this issue in Red5 community already. The result seems that it will only violate the patent if one creates both the client and the server. I believe this is not true for both Red5 and gnash. But I am not alawyer of course. Forgive me if I was wrong. :-)We have both a client and a server, although the RTMP implementation in Cygnal & Gnash is over a year old. The patent is a few days old. - rob - _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
