Dossy Shiobara wrote:
benefit from a "remove Boost usage from Gnash" bounty, first. I'd
support that financially: Boost and C++ in general has no place in
portable software development, period.
Um, as parts of Boost are becoming parts of the C++ libstdc++
library, this isn't accurate. We have very light usage of boost, mostly
just a few typedefs and thread support. It would be entirely possible to
use glib instead, but you'll have the same problems on win32 as you do
with Boost. I do find boost drives me crazy sometimes when porting
Gnash, bjam truly sucks as a build system, and boost barely cross compiles.
- rob -
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
