On 2008.06.11, Rob Savoye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Um, as parts of Boost are becoming parts of the C++ libstdc++ library, > this isn't accurate. We have very light usage of boost, mostly just a few > typedefs and thread support. It would be entirely possible to use glib > instead, but you'll have the same problems on win32 as you do with Boost. > I do find boost drives me crazy sometimes when porting Gnash, bjam truly > sucks as a build system, and boost barely cross compiles.
I'm not so concerned about Win32 support as Boost is fine there. I'm worried about platforms like Haiku that only have GCC 2.x and no Boost port. It would be nice to just write our own portable code for what we actually need, rather than dragging in the whole kitchen sink as a dependency for just a few dingleberries. -- Dossy Shiobara | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
