On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Russ Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Gilmore writes:
>  > See:
>  >
>  >   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Distro_Version_Migration_Nastiness
>  >
>  > for a comment on things that regressed since F7 or so:
>  >
>  >   gnash: Tomeu created an OLPC-3 branch in order to avoid building a
>  >   load of unneeded stuff which had extra dependencies (Qt plugin,
>  >   etc). This kind of thing should probably be pushed into Fedora as a
>  >   whole.
>  >
>  > Please coordinate with Tomeu Vizoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for these
>  > package configuration improvements.
>
> I'm confused.  Are changes to gnash necessary, or is this simply a
> custom build of gnash?  Tomeu, can you tell us what you had to do?

Hmm, not sure which action needs to be taken by gnash developers, if any.

I mainly built that rpm because gnash was causing our mozilla-based
browser to crash, due to #23698 and also because we wanted to update
to 0.8.3. I backported the changes we had made to the rpm for OLPC-2
(based on F-7) but probably that wasn't needed.

If gnash 0.8.3 (plus the fix for #23698) gets built for F-9, we could
try to use that and see if it brings in any unneeded dependencies.

Regards,

Tomeu


_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev

Reply via email to