On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > Hmm, not sure which action needs to be taken by gnash developers, if any.
This is more a fedora thing, indeed. > I mainly built that rpm because gnash was causing our mozilla-based > browser to crash, due to #23698 and also because we wanted to update > to 0.8.3. I backported the changes we had made to the rpm for OLPC-2 > (based on F-7) but probably that wasn't needed. > > If gnash 0.8.3 (plus the fix for #23698) gets built for F-9, we could > try to use that and see if it brings in any unneeded dependencies. Currently devel has gnash-0.8.3, but I still haven't have time to test it, since it crashed because of a pulseaudio bug which is resolved now. I am very busy right now, so if you have time to test gnash in devel, sync F-9 (and F-8) with devel if there is no issue, no problem. I'll make you co-maintainer if you apply to the packagedb. -- Pat _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
