strk wrote:
Agreed. It's just the "replace" idea I'm against.
Adding RTMP is good.
Best if keeping the IOChannel abstraction for final use.
Ideally, yes. Abstractions like that are usually good, although
IOChannel may need to evolve some to support the 64 I/O channels used in
a single RTMP connection, plus to handle sending Camera and Microphone
AMF objects to a server.
Replacing any package always has a bit of uncertainty, but I'm not
worried about it. I've got some thoughts on adding support for testing
networking, more than what I do now, which is mostly just testing
encoding and decoding of packets.
- rob -
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
