On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:45:17AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > strk wrote: > > > >Agreed. It's just the "replace" idea I'm against. > >Adding RTMP is good. > >Best if keeping the IOChannel abstraction for final use. > > Ideally, yes. Abstractions like that are usually good, although > IOChannel may need to evolve some to support the 64 I/O channels used in > a single RTMP connection, plus to handle sending Camera and Microphone > AMF objects to a server.
Could they be up to 64 distinct IOChannel instances obtained from an RTMP client handle ? --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
