Jason Woofenden writes: > I've looked at a considerable amount of the existing code for > handling AMF and just about everything I've seen has been badly > designed, inneficient, innacurately commented and buggy.
AND it's spelt wrong! > If you want to convince this developer community that we should use > your code, and that we should maintain it in the case of your > absense, you need to explain to us your reasons for designing it > that way, not just dodge the question by telling us that we don't > know much about it. If there's something you think we don't know: > tell us. People have different development styles. I'm not going to argue against Rob's. He's too productive. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com | Software that needs Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | documentation is software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | that needs repair. Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
