Jason wrote: > If you want to convince this developer community that we should use your code, > and that we should maintain it in the case of your absense, you need to > explain > to us your reasons for designing it that way, not just dodge the question by > telling us that we don't know much about it. If there's something you think we > don't know: tell us.
Rob wrote: > You obviously fail to grasp the > multitude of ways AMF gets used, which makes any serious discussion > impossible. Jason wrote: > The ONLY REASON there's no serious discussion is that YOU REFUSE to > give serious answers. Psycoterapists around for some groupwork terapy ? :) > If you can give me any pointers on getting you to actually discuss > your design decisions, and the way you see the problems to be solved, > please let me know. I belive we should try to keep the technical thread alive and discuss openly as a group. The idea of 'solving' this at the Hackaton doesn't convince me much (I guess Jason won't be there, and he's surely an important piece of it). --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
