Our gnash swf player is very very slow, there are very much room to optimize in the code. I think we should remove boost library.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:00 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Gnash-dev mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Gnash-dev digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. TeddyMark, a flash framerate benchmark (John Gilmore) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:21:04 -0800 > From: John Gilmore <[email protected]> > Subject: [Gnash-dev] TeddyMark, a flash framerate benchmark > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > > FYI, adobe runs faster or slower in various browsers, on the same > hardware and OS. This must mean there's room to optimize in the > flash/browser interface code. I don't know whether ours is fast or > slow. > > John > > Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:06:35 +0800 > From: "Carlos Nazareno" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: GNOME vs XFCE + TeddyMark > >>> If both browsers were using the same SWF plugin, then this is extremely >>> remarkable, and merits investigation. > > Whoops! I forgot! Flash *does* perform differently under different browsers. > > In terms of Flash 9 framerates in WinXP, > FireFox 2.x < Opera 9.x < IE 6 > > With my current rig: > Flash 10 TeddyMark Framerate > IE 7 < Opera 9.63 < Safari 3.2 < Firefox 3.05 > (Safari & Firefox are very close with about 3 fps difference) > > Ever since Firefox 3 was released, Flash has performed better on it > than in Opera. (if I remember correctly, same results under Ubuntu > Hardy). > > If Browse is based on Firefox as people say (I thought it was > XULRunner? -> same engine that Firefox uses, but is not Firefox), then > this makes things even worse in the case of Browse because Adobe Flash > in Firefox 3 normally runs even faster than in Opera 9.x. > > Anyway, I think it's the upscaling/zooming in that's causing Browse's > poor Flash (and everything else's!) performance in comparison to > Opera. > > Again, it would be real cool if you guys would run the benchmark just > so we can see tangible CPU performance numbers :) > > TeddyMark for XO (reduced # of Teddies from 200 to 16!) can be run from: > > http://www.phlashers.com/lab/teddymark/index.html > > I'll make sourcefiles and sourcecode hopefully available over the > weekend, but I gotta get back to work 1st then get some sleep. > > The .swf you can rip directly from this URL: > http://www.phlashers.com/lab/teddymark/teddyMarkAS2_16.swf > of you want to run it on Gnash in standalone mode. I wouldn't > recommend doing that thos as fullscreen Flash for a CPU-heavy app > would be a framerate killer. > > Nyt all! > > - -Naz > > - -- > Carlos Nazareno > http://www.object404.com > - -- > interactive media specialist > zen graffiti studios > http://www.zengraffiti.com > - -- > Philippine Flash ActionScripters > http://www.phlashers.com > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > ------- End of Forwarded Message > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Gnash-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev > > > End of Gnash-dev Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6 > **************************************** > _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
