On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote: > On 06/04/10 07:01, strk wrote:
> > Rob, any reason not to use the check_equals() macro ? > > Yes, I dislike the check API, and prefer the DejaGnu one. > We really should use one testing API, but as both work, > I see no reason to enforce one or the other. Could you please say more about what you don't like about the check API ? I said what I like about it. Will repeat it: the 'check' API reports both success/failure both expected/obtained results in case of failure. In the specific case detected by Ben, if we were using check_equals we would see as part of the failure message the results obtained with the proprietary player, which should become what we expect. --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
