On 06/04/10 08:36, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 07:16 -0600 schrieb Rob Savoye:
>
> Well, three of them pass in Gnash, but since they don't pass in the pp
> that doesn't really mean anything and in fact is rather misleading when
> it comes to working on that code.
The PASS is probably wrong. These bring up the issue of when the test
case itself is under development along with the code. As those functions
aren't implemented in Gnash, testing them is rather bogus. It'd probably
be a good idea to make them pass with the proprietary player, and then
make them XFAIL for Gnash till they're implemented.
I mostly wanted to get all the variables and remote method calling
working before finishing up this more obscure functionality of the class.
- rob -
_______________________________________________
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
